This is part 2 discussing how Wal-Mart has impacted the US economy. Part 1, which briefly discusses some positives can be found at Walmart is Good For US(A). There will eventually be a follow-up post with my own stance on this subject, and if there are enough quality comments between these two posts, there will probably by a summary post highlighting the best comments.
Wal-Mart is a strenuous competitor that continually pushes their own employees and their suppliers to find ways to sell the same product for less money each year while still making Wal-Mart money. The sheer size of the retailer has placed it in the unique position of being able to dictate to vendors what they will buy, how much they will buy, when and where it will be delivered, and what price they will pay. In addition, vendors must be tied in to Wal-Mart’s supply system which imposes its own set of costs and conditions.
This size and emphasis on cutting costs has led to significant effects. Unfortunately, a lot of them are negative. Frontline, on PBS, looked into the issue and came up with the documentary Is Wal-Mart Good For America?
For a couple of sites devoted to problems Wal-Mart causes, head on over to Wal-mart Watch and Wake Up Wal-Mart.
Manufacturing Pressure
One of the biggest competitive advantages that Wal-Mart had was on its relentless pursuit of cost savings. The business model is to drive margins down and make the profit on the volumes. As a business model, it promises much to the consumer, while at the same time squeezing the vendors tightly.
The biggest problem is that Wal-Mart has no vendor loyalty. If a manufacturer cannot or will not meet their demands, they will find a competitor who will. As time goes by, the demands to produce the same product for Wal-Mart at a cheaper and cheaper price wears down on companies. The initial impact is to force companies to become more productive and efficient.
After this initial gain however, the continual downward pressure forces manufacturers to take drastic measures to continue to cut costs. These measures include outsourcing production to foreign countries to take advantage of lower wages and the corresponding elimination of jobs in America. Between 2001-2006, it is estimated that the impact of Wal-Mart’s imports from China alone cost nearly 200,000 US jobs (Naked Capitalism).
Remember the emphasis Wal-Mart used to put on ‘Made in America’? It isn’t true anymore. Wal-Mart is now the largest importer in the country, with estimates that they bring in as much as $30 Billion in products from China alone. 70% or more of the non-food items in the stores are manufactured in China. Korea, Japan, India, Taiwan and Mexico are among a host of other nations taking a share of the manufacturing jobs for Wal-Mart items.
Not much left in America except for the low-wage retail jobs.
Local Competitors Driven Out
Numerous studies have shown that when a big-box store moves into a community, there is a net increase in employment on Opening Day. Over the next several years there is a steady decline in retail jobs as local businesses have to adjust to the increased competition.
The opening of a single superstore is similar in impact to 100 small businesses opening at once. For local businesses without deep pockets, it can be too much to absorb. Those previously successful businesses close down and their employees have few options for employment that do not include moving to the discounter.
The best comparison I can come up with is losing blood. If it is taken out over time, through multiple blood donations, it is a net positive helping many people. It is possible to get 2, 3, even 5 gallons of blood that way. When it happens all at once, losing 2 or 3 gallons of blood is going to be fatal.
The habit of locating these giant stores in suburban and rural communities guarantees that there will be this negative fallout. Small communities do not have the experience or population to manage an opening of a retailer that big without these problems. Should Wal-Mart have chosen to locate in urban areas with higher populations and densities, the impact would be less serious as a superstore would be a significantly smaller increase compared to the total economic activity of the area.
This is not purely hearsay or rhetoric. Professor David Neumark, from UC-Davis, authored a paper title The Effects of Wal-Mart on Local Labor Markets. This paper goes into 58 pages of detail on these impacts and focuses specifically on the impact on jobs and wages.
Wage and Jobs Pressure
To go along with the manufacturing pressure that has driven a lot of production overseas, the same business pressures help to drive down wages at both the retail and manufacturing side of the economy. Those manufacturers who try to keep jobs in this country have to cut their wages. This requires either fewer workers or lower wages for the same number of employees, or both.
On the retail side, the decreased availability of better paying retail jobs results in the same impact – fewer jobs and lower wages for the jobs that are available. Wal-Mart has consistently been rated as one of the lower-paying big-box retailers, so the new jobs are not equivalent to the lost jobs. From Organic Consumers Association, Wal-Mart Trade Deficit Saves Newly Unemployed $2500 per Year.
Anti-Union
Unions have not always been the best thing for our country. History is full of many cases where unions have tolerated or encouraged behavior contrary to moral and ethical boundaries. History is also full of cases where workers uniting resulted in huge positive benefits for communities and employees.
Wal-Mart is one company today that is not only anti-union, but they actively fight against any group effort to negotiate with them. Due to its size, individual employees have no effective ability to negotiate fair wages, benefits, or policies with the company. With no unions allowed, it is not possible to produce groups with enough power to negotiate either.
Starton page 8 of this paper put out by American Rights at Work, titled Wal-Mart: Rolling Back Workers’ Wages, Rights, and the American Dream, details how Wal-Mart continues to remain union-free despite the working conditions and large number of employees.
Conclusion
Wal-Mart’s business practices do a great job at making the company large, powerful, and profitable. The net impact on everybody but Wal-Mart is definitely not as great. In our Capitalistic society, they are acting as one would predict – with self-interest at the forefront, particularly their own short-term self interest. Since their self-interest is not the interest of the country or individual cities and citizens, many people are severely negatively affected.
From Walmart is Good For US(A), we know that they do a good job at providing low prices and jobs. That has a cost. I invite everybody to provide their civil feedback to both this post and the positive post. Share you thought on which side is better: the positives or the negatives and why. Things that I missed, positive and negative, are welcome.
After some time has passed to gather the best comments, I will follow-up with a summary post of what you have to say. Eventually, I will come out as well with my stance on if Wal-Mart is a net positive or negative for America.