One of the things that keep coming up in my posts is that I feel the Federal government is too big and intrusive.  From a simple financial viewpoint it is either too big or we are not taxed enough.  The government needs to be able to supply the services it does using just the resources available to it.

In that respect, our federal government should operate no differently than we do.  While it is acceptable to occasionally spend more than we make, we need to save up to replace the extra spending or have paid for the 'surge' out of savings that we already have.  Constant deficit spending is bad for us and is bad for our government.

I have recently come across the website for a minor political party which seems to have a similar viewpoint: The Populist Party.  If you view their basic platform and self explanation, they are actually arguing for politicians at the national level to voluntarily reduce their own power to create a smaller national government and to strengthen state and local governments.  The best part is that they argue for personal responsibility and freedom where it does not interfere with others freedoms.

What do you think about this?  I am going to look into them further myself.  Hopefully the surface view holds upon further review and they are truly mainstream enough that there will be hope of helping them become a major party (because why should we be limited to two parties?)

I definitely see how they could be a fringe group whose idealism and fanaticism far exceeds what is useful or reasonable.  At the same time, they could also be a group whose view can be accepted and adopted by Americans across this great country.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!